Recipe for Innovation: Creative and critical Thinking
It is hard to cook a dish properly if you’re missing a key ingredient. And yet businesses often wonder why they have trouble getting innovation right. They know they need creative thinking– and lots of it. But they often lack the ability to transform their creative ideas into polished products for the real world.
Several examples demonstrate that great ideas are not enough. Innovation – successful innovation – requires the application of critical thinking as well. This is the ingredient that so many companies miss. What is required is a robust integration of both creative and critical thinking, a back-and-forth, iterative process that fosters maximum creativity, while at the same time bringing a clear-eyed understanding of how an idea will play out.
Faced with today’s increased demand for innovation, many companies are searching for new ways to encourage creative thinking. At the level of the organizational culture, they are reinforcing the notion that it is OK if an idea fails – employees will not be penalized for thinking outside the box and striking out. Businesses are also adopting new techniques for brainstorming and synthesizing ideas. What many companies are less successful at, however, is bringing critical thinking into the picture at the right point in time.
How Critical Thinking Works
How can it be applied to the creative process without killing ideas before they are fully formed? There are three essential elements of critical thinking:
- Recognizing assumptions: This involves separating fact from opinion. Too often, we accept unsupported information as accurate because it reinforces our own beliefs, because the speaker is particularly credible. Many innovations fail because companies assume that their ideas will instantly be embraced by the public – ignoring warning signs that might suggest otherwise.
- Evaluating information: This involves stepping back and objectively sorting through different positions. Another reason innovations fail is that people often let emotions – their own or others’ – color their decisions. Or, people may go along with someone else’s position to avoid conflict. It is essential to systematically review and evaluate information in an unbiased manner.
- Drawing conclusions: This involves bringing diverse information together to arrive at conclusions that logically follow the evidence. Innovations will have a greater chance of success when people do not generalize beyond the evidence at hand, and are willing to change their positions as the evidence changes.
All three elements of critical thinking call for the ability to step back and take a hard look at the problems an innovation may face. One of the common features in the postmortems of innovation failures is that executives were told of potential problems, but for one reason or another went ahead despite the concerns.
Both creative and critical thinking flourish best when there is maximum diversity. A broad knowledge pool and wide ranging perspectives provide rich soil for innovation. Nothing stifles innovation like the sameness of thought.
Excerpts modified from Pearson TalentLens White Paper – with the same title. Write to firstname.lastname@example.org for the complete White Paper.